| No. |
Proposed Changes |
Status |
Description of the change |
| V2 |
Coastal Occupancy Charges |
- Notified 4/5/00
- Submissions 2/6/00
- Summary 31/8/00
- Further Submissions 28/9/00
- Hearing 6/11/00
- Decision 18/1/01
- Withdrawn 31/5/07
- Overturned
Currently Under Appeal
|
The RMA requires Councils to place a statement in their Regional Coastal Plans either setting out a coastal occupancy charges regime or to say they will not do so. Variation 3 inserts a new section into the Plan which in essences states that the Council considers the charges are justified, however there are a number of issues which need to be dealt with before a charging regime is introduced. |
| PC8 |
Heritage Trees |
|
This plan change proposes that 29 additional heritage trees be protected within the Heritage Register (contained in Appendix A of the Plan), and that one tree be removed from the Register. The Planning Maps are proposed to be amended to show these new trees and, where the location of existing trees has been mapped on the Register inaccurately, the maps will be amended to show correct tree locations. |
| PC13 |
Special Subdivision Rules |
- Notified 21/4/05
- Submissions 20/5/05
- Summary 9/6/05
- Further Submissions 8/7/05
- Hearing 19-20/9/05
- Decision 8/12/05
Currently Under Appeal |
The Plan has a range of subdivision rules applying to each of the different zones. There are also special subdivision rules, which essentially allow non-compliance with discretionary activity allotment sizes to be assessed as discretionary activities, rather than non-complying. A question of interpretation over the status of special subdivision provisions in Rural Zones has resulted in a need for the provisions to be clarified through a plan change. The proposed change is to return the Plan to a state for special subdivisions in the Rural One Zone that existed immediately prior to the Plan becoming operative. |
| PC15 |
Oyster Bay, Port Underwood |
|
This was a private plan change application to rezone approximately 26 hectares of land legally described as Lot 6 DP 11879 and a portion of Pt Sec Blk XII Arapawa SD in Oyster Bay, Port Underwood from Rural One to Sounds Residential. The Council declined the request. This decision was confirmed by the Environment Court on appeal.
|
| PC16 |
Allocation of Authorisations (Marine Farming) |
Notified 12/3/09
Schedule of Changes
NZKS Sec 165I Report
Public Notice - Summary of Submissions PC16 and PC53 23/7/09
Submissions Received
Summary of Submissions |
Allocation of Authorisations - In 2005 legislation was introduced which substantively changed the way in which aquaculture is managed in New Zealand. All new marine farms are now required to be located in specifically created aquaculture management areas (AMA) or zones, with the right to apply for resource consent to undertake marine farming (authorisation) within the AMA allocated by various means set out in the Resource Management Act 1991.
Plan Change 16 introduces the new chapter structure which will contain the revised aquaculture provisions in the future. The plan change also introduce new policy and objectives regarding how authorisations, or the right to apply for resource consent for marine farming within a newly created AMA, will be allocated. The plan change specifically introduces new rules which deal with the allocation of authorisations when the AMA has arisen from a private plan change. These rules will not have effect until the plan change is made operative.
Plan Change 16 is a private plan change lodged by New Zealand King Salmon Limited. The plan change is the first of a number of plan changes proposed to amend the aquaculture provisions in the Plans, in accordance with the new legislation. For the avoidance of doubt this plan change do not create new areas for aquaculture, nor does it change the criteria in the Plan by which existing marine farms are managed.
Plan Change 16 (Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan) consists of the following:
Volume One
Update to the 9.1 Introduction
A new section( 9.1.2) which discusses aquaculture management under the new legislation
A new section (9.4A), objectives, policies and methods of implementation for the allocation of authorisations in AMA's
Volume Two
A new zone chapter (35A) for aquaculture management areas which introduces new rules regarding the allocation of authorisations in operative AMA's which arise from a private plan change. These rules will not have effect until Plan Change 16 becomes operative. |
| PC17 |
Heritage Buildings, Places and Sites |
|
The proposed plan change seeks to further protect the Oparapara (Samson Bay) Argillite Quarries, which is currently recognised by the NZHPT as a Class A historic place. Two additional quarry sites within the Samson Bay area are proposed to be protected within the Plan, along with amendments to fix planning map errors associated with the existing Argillite Quarries heritage listing within the Plan. The proposed plan change also seeks to list the Tory Channel Leading Lights, and the former oil store shed associated with the lights, on the Register of Significant Heritage Resources within the Plan. The Tory Channel Leading Lights serve as both an important navigation tool within the Tory Channel, and as an historic reminder of local marine history. It is proposed that they are protected as a Class A heritage resource. |
| PC23 |
Frost Fans |
|
The Marlborough District Council is proposing to change the Plan standards and requirements relating to frost fans. The proposed plan change involves the change in status of frost fans from a permitted activity to a controlled activity and includes the introduction of amended noise standards. The new requirements are proposed as a means for Council to proactively manage the adverse noise effects resulting from new frost fans. In order to mange reverse sensitivity effects associated with frost fans, a new rule is also proposed to establish a noise standard applicable to new habitable buildings located in close proximity to existing frost fans.
While, to date, the issues associated with frost fans have been limited with regard to the Wairau/Awatere Resource Management Plan, given there is the potential for similar noise issues to arise within the Marlborough Sounds area, it is proposed that the Marlborough Sounds Resource Management Plan also be amended to ensure consistent environmental management within the District. |